ASTS vs LUNR: which stock is the better buy?
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. and Intuitive Machines, Inc., graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Intuitive Machines, Inc. grades higher — 53/100 vs 50/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | ASTS | LUNR |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 50/100 | 53/100 ✓ |
| Price | $85.13 | $19.58 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $141.20 | $35.87 |
| Implied upside | +65.9% | +83.2% ✓ |
| Bull / bear range | $183.77 / $109.28 | $42.97 / $30.70 |
| P/E | -47.3 ✓ | -22.0 |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1505.2% ✓ | -7.9% |
| Gross margin | -27.0% | 25.7% ✓ |
| Market cap | $34.6B | $3.1B |
| Sector | Communication Services | Industrials |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on ASTS and LUNR?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
ASTS vs LUNR — FAQ (2026)
Is ASTS or LUNR the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) currently grades higher at 53/100 versus 50/100 for ASTS. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, ASTS or LUNR?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +65.9% for ASTS and +83.2% for LUNR. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this ASTS vs LUNR comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.