CLSK vs MARA: which stock is the better buy?
CleanSpark, Inc. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, CleanSpark, Inc. grades higher — 63/100 vs 48/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | CLSK | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 63/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Price | $12.62 | $12.40 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $19.54 | $8.17 |
| Implied upside | +54.8% ✓ | -34.1% |
| Bull / bear range | $26.26 / $15.05 | $14.31 / $3.49 |
| P/E | -6.5 ✓ | -2.3 |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +102.2% ✓ | +38.2% |
| Gross margin | 19.2% ✓ | 0.3% |
| Market cap | $3.2B | $4.7B |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on CLSK and MARA?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
CLSK vs MARA — FAQ (2026)
Is CLSK or MARA the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) currently grades higher at 63/100 versus 48/100 for MARA. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, CLSK or MARA?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +54.8% for CLSK and -34.1% for MARA. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this CLSK vs MARA comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.