CRWD vs ZS: which stock is the better buy?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Zscaler, Inc., graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Zscaler, Inc. grades higher — 69/100 vs 63/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | CRWD | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 63/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Price | $193.98 | $147.33 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $204.41 | $119.68 |
| Implied upside | +5.4% ✓ | -18.8% |
| Bull / bear range | $258.61 / $172.14 | $154.91 / $102.71 |
| P/E | -8028.9 ✓ | -306.9 |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +21.7% | +23.3% ✓ |
| Gross margin | 75.0% | 76.7% ✓ |
| Market cap | $197.5B | $23.8B |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on CRWD and ZS?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
CRWD vs ZS — FAQ (2026)
Is CRWD or ZS the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) currently grades higher at 69/100 versus 63/100 for CRWD. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, CRWD or ZS?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +5.4% for CRWD and -18.8% for ZS. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this CRWD vs ZS comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.