FSLR vs ENPH: which stock is the better buy?
First Solar, Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc., graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, First Solar, Inc. grades higher — 66/100 vs 64/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | FSLR | ENPH |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 66/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Price | $224.57 | $43.07 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $291.98 | $58.49 |
| Implied upside | +30.0% | +35.8% ✓ |
| Bull / bear range | $378.55 / $239.02 | $73.90 / $48.95 |
| P/E | 14.5 ✓ | 41.9 |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +24.1% ✓ | +10.7% |
| Gross margin | 41.7% | 44.2% ✓ |
| Market cap | $24.1B | $5.7B |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on FSLR and ENPH?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
FSLR vs ENPH — FAQ (2026)
Is FSLR or ENPH the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) currently grades higher at 66/100 versus 64/100 for ENPH. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, FSLR or ENPH?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +30.0% for FSLR and +35.8% for ENPH. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this FSLR vs ENPH comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.