GS vs MS: which stock is the better buy?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Morgan Stanley, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Morgan Stanley grades higher — 62/100 vs 55/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 55/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Price | $1,021.00 | $213.92 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $1,254.04 | $273.39 |
| Implied upside | +22.8% | +27.8% ✓ |
| Bull / bear range | $1,531.40 / $1,064.29 | $331.92 / $238.15 |
| P/E | 18.4 ✓ | 19.2 |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.4% | +11.5% ✓ |
| Gross margin | 55.5% | 58.0% ✓ |
| Market cap | $301.2B | $337.4B |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on GS and MS?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
GS vs MS — FAQ (2026)
Is GS or MS the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Morgan Stanley (MS) currently grades higher at 62/100 versus 55/100 for GS. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, GS or MS?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +22.8% for GS and +27.8% for MS. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this GS vs MS comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.