TradersQuant — Market Intelligence

IONQ vs QBTS: which stock is the better buy?

IonQ, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc., graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.

On today’s numbers, D-Wave Quantum Inc. grades higher — 54/100 vs 50/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.

Metric by metric

MetricIONQQBTS
TradersQuant Score50/10054/100
Price$49.12$22.54
12-mo base forecast$60.03$26.55
Implied upside+22.2%+17.8%
Bull / bear range$84.54 / $41.58$36.22 / $19.57
P/E545.8-19.6
Forward P/E
Revenue growth (YoY)+201.9%+178.5%
Gross margin38.1%66.3%
Market cap$18.3B$8.3B
SectorTechnologyTechnology

✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.

Want the full verdict on IONQ and QBTS?

The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.

$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged

IONQ vs QBTS — FAQ (2026)

Is IONQ or QBTS the better buy right now?

On the live TradersQuant composite score, D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) currently grades higher at 54/100 versus 50/100 for IONQ. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.

Which has more 12-month upside, IONQ or QBTS?

TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +22.2% for IONQ and +17.8% for QBTS. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.

How is this IONQ vs QBTS comparison calculated?

Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.