JPM vs BAC: which stock is the better buy?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corporation, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Bank of America Corporation grades higher — 66/100 vs 58/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | JPM | BAC |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 58/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Price | $334.47 | $58.73 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $361.24 | $69.06 |
| Implied upside | +8.0% | +17.6% ✓ |
| Bull / bear range | $433.20 / $315.74 | $85.18 / $60.10 |
| P/E | 16.0 | 13.4 ✓ |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.3% ✓ | -0.5% |
| Gross margin | 60.9% | 63.2% ✓ |
| Market cap | $896.2B | $416.8B |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on JPM and BAC?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
JPM vs BAC — FAQ (2026)
Is JPM or BAC the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) currently grades higher at 66/100 versus 58/100 for JPM. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, JPM or BAC?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +8.0% for JPM and +17.6% for BAC. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this JPM vs BAC comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.