LMT vs NOC: which stock is the better buy?
Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Northrop Grumman Corporation grades higher — 62/100 vs 55/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | LMT | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 55/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Price | $545.70 | $549.01 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $637.19 | $613.77 |
| Implied upside | +16.8% ✓ | +11.8% |
| Bull / bear range | $699.13 / $600.69 | $684.46 / $582.07 |
| P/E | 26.3 | 17.2 ✓ |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.7% ✓ | +2.2% |
| Gross margin | 9.8% | 20.5% ✓ |
| Market cap | $125.8B | $78.0B |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on LMT and NOC?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
LMT vs NOC — FAQ (2026)
Is LMT or NOC the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) currently grades higher at 62/100 versus 55/100 for LMT. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, LMT or NOC?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +16.8% for LMT and +11.8% for NOC. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this LMT vs NOC comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.