LULU vs ONON: which stock is the better buy?
Lululemon Athletica Inc. and On Holding AG, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Lululemon Athletica Inc. grades higher — 61/100 vs 59/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | LULU | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 61/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Price | $118.43 | $36.83 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $103.22 | $37.42 |
| Implied upside | -12.8% | +1.6% ✓ |
| Bull / bear range | $127.36 / $89.63 | $53.83 / $26.16 |
| P/E | 9.6 ✓ | 38.6 |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.9% | +24.2% ✓ |
| Gross margin | 55.7% | 63.9% ✓ |
| Market cap | $13.4B | $12.3B |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on LULU and ONON?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
LULU vs ONON — FAQ (2026)
Is LULU or ONON the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) currently grades higher at 61/100 versus 59/100 for ONON. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, LULU or ONON?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies -12.8% for LULU and +1.6% for ONON. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this LULU vs ONON comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.