LULU vs ONON: which stock is the better buy?
Lululemon Athletica Inc and ONON, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of September 14, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Lululemon Athletica Inc grades higher — 62/100 vs 48/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | LULU | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 62/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Price | $98.97 | — |
| 12-mo base forecast | $103.62 | — |
| Implied upside | +4.7% | — |
| Bull / bear range | $123.63 / $92.68 | — |
| P/E | 8.1 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.7 | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.7% | — |
| Gross margin | 56.1% | — |
| Market cap | $11.5B | — |
| Sector | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Unknown |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on LULU and ONON?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
LULU vs ONON — FAQ (2026)
Is LULU or ONON the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU) currently grades higher at 62/100 versus 48/100 for ONON. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, LULU or ONON?
TradersQuant builds a three-scenario (bull/base/bear) 12-month forecast for both names — open the live pages for current figures.
How is this LULU vs ONON comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.