NKE vs LULU: which stock is the better buy?
Nike Inc and Lululemon Athletica Inc, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of September 14, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Lululemon Athletica Inc grades higher — 62/100 vs 60/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | NKE | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 60/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Price | $36.80 | $98.97 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $28.27 | $103.62 |
| Implied upside | -23.2% | +4.7% ✓ |
| Bull / bear range | $36.94 / $22.95 | $123.63 / $92.68 |
| P/E | 17.6 | 8.1 ✓ |
| Forward P/E | 24.6 | 10.7 ✓ |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.2% | +1.7% ✓ |
| Gross margin | 42.9% | 56.1% ✓ |
| Market cap | $54.6B | $11.5B |
| Sector | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on NKE and LULU?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
NKE vs LULU — FAQ (2026)
Is NKE or LULU the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU) currently grades higher at 62/100 versus 60/100 for NKE. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, NKE or LULU?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies -23.2% for NKE and +4.7% for LULU. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this NKE vs LULU comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.