TradersQuant — Market Intelligence

MSFT vs AMZN: which stock is the better buy?

Microsoft Corporation and Amazon.com, Inc., graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.

On today’s numbers, Microsoft Corporation grades higher — 66/100 vs 64/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.

Metric by metric

MetricMSFTAMZN
TradersQuant Score66/10064/100
Price$390.49$242.67
12-mo base forecast$405.66$292.28
Implied upside+3.9%+20.4%
Bull / bear range$507.52 / $350.49$371.44 / $244.05
P/E23.228.6
Forward P/E
Revenue growth (YoY)+14.9%+12.4%
Gross margin68.3%50.6%
Market cap$2.90T$2.61T
SectorTechnologyConsumer Cyclical

✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.

Want the full verdict on MSFT and AMZN?

The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.

$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged

MSFT vs AMZN — FAQ (2026)

Is MSFT or AMZN the better buy right now?

On the live TradersQuant composite score, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) currently grades higher at 66/100 versus 64/100 for AMZN. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.

Which has more 12-month upside, MSFT or AMZN?

TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +3.9% for MSFT and +20.4% for AMZN. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.

How is this MSFT vs AMZN comparison calculated?

Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.