SCHD vs VYM: which stock is the better buy?
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF grades higher — 53/100 vs 52/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | SCHD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 53/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Price | $32.39 | $159.48 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $37.93 | $182.90 |
| Implied upside | +17.1% ✓ | +14.7% |
| Bull / bear range | $41.98 / $35.20 | $206.03 / $166.64 |
| P/E | — | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Market cap | $94.9B | $96.0B |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on SCHD and VYM?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
SCHD vs VYM — FAQ (2026)
Is SCHD or VYM the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) currently grades higher at 53/100 versus 52/100 for VYM. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, SCHD or VYM?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +17.1% for SCHD and +14.7% for VYM. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this SCHD vs VYM comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.