GLD vs IBIT: which stock is the better buy?
SPDR Gold Shares and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF, graded by the same fixed-weight model from live fundamentals — composite score, 12-month forecast, valuation, growth and margins, side by side. As of July 6, 2026.
On today’s numbers, iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF grades higher — 51/100 vs 50/100. Tap either card for the full factor breakdown.
Metric by metric
| Metric | GLD | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| TradersQuant Score | 50/100 | 51/100 ✓ |
| Price | $378.13 | $34.87 |
| 12-mo base forecast | $452.94 | $27.42 |
| Implied upside | +19.8% ✓ | -21.4% |
| Bull / bear range | $490.37 / $424.35 | $42.53 / $16.17 |
| P/E | — | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Market cap | $133.1B | $58.1B |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
✓ marks the stronger reading per metric (lower is better for P/E). Figures refresh continuously; research, not financial advice.
Want the full verdict on GLD and IBIT?
The AI bull/base/bear thesis, smart-money positioning, options signals and insider activity on both — every systematic call graded in public against the S&P 500.
$0 today · cancel before day 7 and you won’t be charged
GLD vs IBIT — FAQ (2026)
Is GLD or IBIT the better buy right now?
On the live TradersQuant composite score, iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) currently grades higher at 51/100 versus 50/100 for GLD. The score weighs valuation, growth, earnings quality, momentum, the macro regime, sentiment and balance-sheet risk — open each stock's page for the full breakdown. Research, not financial advice.
Which has more 12-month upside, GLD or IBIT?
TradersQuant's 12-month base-case forecast currently implies +19.8% for GLD and -21.4% for IBIT. Both forecasts are three-scenario models (bull/base/bear) refreshed continuously and graded on our public track record.
How is this GLD vs IBIT comparison calculated?
Both stocks are scored by the same fixed-weight model — 20% valuation, 20% growth, 15% earnings quality, 15% momentum, 10% macro regime fit, 10% analyst sentiment, 10% balance-sheet risk — from live fundamentals and prices. No hand-picking: the same arithmetic runs on every stock we cover, and our systematic calls are graded in public against the S&P 500.